Progressive West v. Preciado
| PROGRESSIVE WEST INSURANCE COMPANY |
| SIMON H. PRECIADO |
| 06-80139 |
| October 12, 2006 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2006. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Calendar materials being prepared. [06-17367, 06-80139] [06-17367, 06-80139] (AW) [Entered: 12/27/2006 11:48 AM] |
Filing 5
Order filed the petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1453 (c) is granted. Within 10 days petitioner shall perfect the appeal. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1453(c)(2) the court shall complete all action on this appeal not later than 60 days after the date on which the appeal was filed. The parties shall file simultaneous briefs in the Clerk's Office in San Francisco by 4:30 p.m. on 01/04/07. Each brief shall be received in the office of opposing counsel on the date of the brief is due in this court. Any motion to extend time to file the briefs shall strictly comply with the requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C. section 1453(c)(3). The Clerk shall calendar this case during the week of 02/12/07 in San Francisco. (Faxed to Parties via MOATT's Caroline) ( Procedurally Terminated After Other Judicial Action; Granted/Other. M. M. McKEOWN, Raymond C. FISHER ) [06-80139] (DJV) [Entered: 12/22/2006 11:46 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Received Respondent Simon H. Preciado's answer to petition for leave to appeal; served on 10/17/06. (MOATT) (DJV) [Entered: 10/19/2006 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED ON 10/10/06: AN ORIGINAL AND 4 COPIES OF A PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 1453; served on 10/10/06 (MOATT) (CP) [Entered: 10/12/2006 12:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
