The General Store, I v. Van Loan
Plaintiff - Appellant,: THE GENERAL STORE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee,: RICHARD VAN LOAN, Director of Industry Operations, Seattle Field Division, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, ATF
Case Number: 07-35417
Filed: May 23, 2007
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 31, 2009 The General Store, I v. Van Loan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 920090331 Opinion
December 31, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 920081231 Opinion
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: The General Store, I v. Van Loan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: THE GENERAL STORE, INC.
Represented By: Richard E. Gardiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: RICHARD VAN LOAN, Director of Industry Operations, Seattle Field Division, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, ATF
Represented By: Rolf Harry Tangvald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?