James Brown v. Southern California IBEW-NECA
Defendant - Appellant,: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA TRUST FUNDS, a unicorporated association
Plaintiff - Appellee,: JAMES BROWN, an individual
Case Number: 08-55398
Filed: March 17, 2008
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 7, 2009 James Brown v. Southern California IBEW-NECA

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 920091207 Opinion
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Brown v. Southern California IBEW-NECA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant,: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA TRUST FUNDS, a unicorporated association
Represented By: Donald Charles Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee,: JAMES BROWN, an individual
Represented By: John R. St. John
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?