Log Cabin Republicans v. USDC-CAC
| In re: LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a non-profit corporation |
| LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity |
| 08-73194 |
| July 24, 2008 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Order filed (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, BARRY G. SILVERMAN and JAY S. BYBEE) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. (KKW) |
| Filing 9 Added attorney Patrick Hunnius for Log Cabin Republicans, in case 08-73194. (MT) |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Patrick O. Hunnius for Petitioner Log Cabin Republicans in 08-73194. Date of service: 12/10/2008. [6734170] [08-73194, 08-56185] (PH) |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) - Log Cabin Republicans and Petitioner Log Cabin Republicans in 08-73194 reply to response (Received Response to Order ). Date of service: 11/10/2008. [6707728] [08-73194, 08-56185] (PH) |
| Filing 6 Electronically-filed document [5] Brief Submitted for Review (ECF Filing) is stricken because there is an error in the document (incorrect docket event used-see order). (LA) |
| Filing 5 Submitted (ECF) Reply brief for review. Submitted by - Log Cabin Republicans and Petitioner Log Cabin Republicans in 08-73194. Date of service: 11/10/2008. [6703567] [08-73194, 08-56185] (PH) |
| Filing 4 Received appearance notice of Attorney(s) Henry Charles Whitaker and Anthony J. Steinmeyer for party(s) USA Real Party in Interest USA, in case 08-73194. Served on 10/29/2008. (MT) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY UPDATED. Filed Respondent USDC-CAC response of the united states to madamus petition (motion to stay further action). Served on 10/29/2008. (NEW) |
| Filing 2 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) This petition for a writ of mandamus raises issues that warrant a response. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(b). Accordingly, within 14 days after the date of this order, the real parties in interest shall file a response. The district court, within 14 days after the date of this order, may file a response if it so desires. Petitioner may file a reply within 5 days after service of the response(s). The petition, response(s) and any reply shall be referred to the next available motions panel. (KD) |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. (HC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
