Damian Dudley v. County of Maricopa, et al
| Plaintiff - Appellant,: |
DAMIAN L. DUDLEY |
| Defendant - Appellee,: |
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, JOE ARPAIO, Sheriff of Maricopa County, ANDREW THOMAS, County Attorney, CYNTHIA GIALKETSIS, Deputy County Attorney, JOHN DOE, Judge of Maricopa County Superior Court, DAVID TUCEK, Phoenix Police Officer #R0829 and TOBY DUNN, Phoenix Police Officer #5041 |
| Case Number: |
09-15165 |
| Filed: |
January 27, 2009 |
| Court: |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Nature of Suit: |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Damian Dudley v. County of Maricopa, et al |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Plaintiff - appellant,: DAMIAN L. DUDLEY |
| Represented By: |
Damian L. Dudley |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant - appellee,: COUNTY OF MARICOPA |
| Represented By: |
No Appearance |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant - appellee,: JOE ARPAIO, Sheriff of Maricopa County |
| Represented By: |
No Appearance |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant - appellee,: ANDREW THOMAS, County Attorney |
| Represented By: |
No Appearance |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant - appellee,: CYNTHIA GIALKETSIS, Deputy County Attorney |
| Represented By: |
No Appearance |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant - appellee,: JOHN DOE, Judge of Maricopa County Superior Court |
| Represented By: |
No Appearance |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant - appellee,: DAVID TUCEK, Phoenix Police Officer #R0829 |
| Represented By: |
No Appearance |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant - appellee,: TOBY DUNN, Phoenix Police Officer #5041 |
| Represented By: |
No Appearance |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
