FTC v. Interbill, Ltd., et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS WELLS
3Rd Party Plaintiff: INTERBILL, LTD.
3Rd Party Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Case Number: 09-16179
Filed: June 9, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2010 Filing 34 MANDATE ISSUED.(MDH, RCF and TMT) [7446595] (Walker, Synitha) [Entered: 08/20/2010 09:38 AM]
June 28, 2010 Filing 33 FILED MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, RAYMOND C. FISHER and TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH) AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [7386336] (DD) [Entered: 06/28/2010 10:52 AM]
June 17, 2010 Filing 32 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, RAYMOND C. FISHER and TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH. [7375601] (EL) [Entered: 06/17/2010 11:15 AM]
June 14, 2010 Filing 31 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, RAYMOND C. FISHER and TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH) At argument, the parties shall be prepared to discuss the impact of FTC v. Neovi, 09-55093, 2010 WL 1930229 (9th Cir. May 14, 2020), on the knowledge issue in this case. [7371583] (SC) [Entered: 06/14/2010 04:14 PM]
June 7, 2010 Filing 30 Filed (ECF) Errata to Answering Brief ([ # 21 ] Brief Submitted for Review (ECF Filing) ). Filed by Appellee FTC. Date of service: 06/07/2010. [7361437] (Arington, Michele) [Entered: 06/07/2010 07:16 AM]
May 18, 2010 Filing 29 Filed (ECF) Appellee FTC citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 05/18/2010. [7340777] (Arington, Michele) [Entered: 05/18/2010 10:59 AM]
April 21, 2010 Filing 28 Notice of Oral Argument on JUNE 17, 2010 Calendar. Please return ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form to: SAN FRANCISCO Office. Attention: The Notice of Docket Activity may not list your case number. Please open attached documents to view details about your case. [7310364] (AM) [Entered: 04/21/2010 04:17 PM]
January 27, 2010 Filing 27 Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [ # 25 ] filed by Interbill, Ltd. and Thomas Wells. One copy to Case Files, the remainder to Records. [7212592] (YA) [Entered: 01/29/2010 09:08 AM]
January 25, 2010 Filing 26 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 25 ] submitted by Interbill, Ltd. and Thomas Wells is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a gray cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [7207259] (LA) [Entered: 01/25/2010 03:56 PM]
January 25, 2010 Filing 25 Submitted (ECF) Reply brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Interbill, Ltd. and Thomas Wells. Date of service: 01/25/2010. [7206687] (Semenza, Lawrence) [Entered: 01/25/2010 01:32 PM]
January 5, 2010 Filing 24 Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [ # 21 ] filed by FTC. [7183736] (SD) [Entered: 01/05/2010 03:47 PM]
January 4, 2010 Filing 23 Oral extension by phone of time to file Interbill, Ltd. and Thomas Wells optional reply brief. Appellant Interbill, Ltd. and Appellant Thomas Wells reply brief due. Optional reply brief is due 28 days after service of the answering brief. [7181063] (January 25, 2010) (TH) [Entered: 01/04/2010 11:10 AM]
December 28, 2009 Filing 22 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 21 ] submitted by FTC is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a red cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [7175849] (LA) [Entered: 12/28/2009 09:31 AM]
December 23, 2009 Filing 21 Submitted (ECF) Answering brief for review. Submitted by Appellee FTC. Date of service: 12/23/2009. [7174331] (Arington, Michele) [Entered: 12/23/2009 12:51 PM]
December 18, 2009 Filing 20 Filed certificate of record on appeal. RT filed in DC None (NT) [7169921] (RL) [Entered: 12/18/2009 04:05 PM]
December 15, 2009 Filing 19 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk:GSS): The appellees motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is now due December 23, 2009. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7164994] (SC) [Entered: 12/15/2009 01:34 PM]
November 16, 2009 Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellee FTC Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 12/23/2009 at 11:59 pm. Date of service: 11/16/2009. [7131000] (Arington, Michele) [Entered: 11/16/2009 09:41 AM]
November 2, 2009 Filing 16 Received 10 paper copies of Opening brief [ # 12 ] filed by Thomas Wells and Interbill, Ltd. in 09-16179. One copy to Case Files, the remainder to Records. [7115977] (SD) [Entered: 11/02/2009 02:14 PM]
October 29, 2009 Filing 18 Filed Appellants Interbill, Ltd. and Thomas Wells excerpts of record in 4 volumes. Served on 10/26/2009. [7138759] (LA) [Entered: 11/20/2009 03:27 PM]
October 29, 2009 Filing 15 Filed clerk order: opening brief [ # 12 ] filed by Thomas Wells and Interbill, Ltd. Within 5 working days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 10 copies of the brief in paper format, with a blue cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [7113268] (LA) [Entered: 10/29/2009 04:31 PM]
October 29, 2009 Filing 14 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk:GSS): The appellants motion to file a late opening brief is granted. The opening brief submitted on October 26, 2009 shall be filed. The answering brief is now due November 30, 2009. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7112604] (SC) [Entered: 10/29/2009 01:36 PM]
October 27, 2009 Filing 13 Received Appellants Interbill, Ltd. and Thomas Wells excerpts of record in 4 volumes. Served on 10/26/2009. (Motion to file late opening brief pending--SHELF) [7109800] (LA) [Entered: 10/27/2009 02:47 PM]
October 26, 2009 Filing 12 Submitted (ECF) Opening brief for review and filed Motion to file a late brief. Submitted by Appellants Interbill, Ltd. and Thomas Wells. Date of service: 10/26/2009. [7108488] (Semenza, Lawrence) [Entered: 10/26/2009 03:44 PM]
October 2, 2009 Filing 11 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner) The court is in receipt of appellants motion for a second extension of time to file the opening brief. (SEE ORDER TEXT) Nonetheless, in the interest of justice, the motion is granted. The court does, however, expect counsel to request telephonic extensions only when counsel anticipates that the brief will in fact be filed within 14 days. The opening brief is now due October 22, 2009. The answering brief is due November 23, 2009. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. (Pro Mo) [7082776] (MS) [Entered: 10/02/2009 11:21 AM]
September 28, 2009 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellants Interbill, Ltd. and Thomas Wells Unopposed Motion to file a late brief. Date of service: 09/28/2009. [7076743] (Semenza, Lawrence) [Entered: 09/28/2009 01:41 PM]
September 11, 2009 Filing 9 14 day oral extension by phone of time to file Appellants Interbill, Ltd. and Thomas Wells's opening brief. [7058932] Appellant Interbill, Ltd. and Appellant Thomas Wells' opening brief due 09/28/2009. Appellee Federal Trade Commission's answering brief due 10/28/2009. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the appellee's answering brief. (AT) [Entered: 09/11/2009 12:43 PM]
August 19, 2009 Filing 8 Filed order MEDIATION (LJE): The court has determined that this appeal will not be selected for inclusion in the Mediation Program. [7032320] (SC) [Entered: 08/19/2009 09:29 AM]
July 29, 2009 Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (EPM): This case is under consideration for inclusion in the Mediation Program. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. A settlement assessment conference will be held by telephone on August 18, 2009, at 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC (San Francisco) Time/2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [7007565] (SC) [Entered: 07/29/2009 09:51 AM]
July 19, 2009 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Interbill, Ltd. and Thomas Wells Civil Appeals Docketing Statement (Form 6). Date of service: 07/19/2009. [6996515] (Semenza, Lawrence) [Entered: 07/19/2009 06:29 PM]
July 7, 2009 Filing 5 Filed order MEDIATION (EPM): Within fourteen (14) days of the filing of this order, appellant shall: (a) file a Civil Appeals Docketing Statement; (b) contact the clerk to assist in locating the Civil Appeals Docketing Statement if one has already been filed; (c) dismiss the appeal voluntarily pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b); or (d) show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [6984166] (SC) [Entered: 07/07/2009 04:51 PM]
June 16, 2009 Filing 4 Added attorney John F. Daly, Michele Arington for FTC, in case 09-16179. [6958159] (NEW) [Entered: 06/16/2009 12:51 PM]
June 16, 2009 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John F. Daly for Appellee FTC. Date of service: 06/16/2009. [6958148] (Arington, Michele) [Entered: 06/16/2009 12:46 PM]
June 16, 2009 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michele Arington for Appellee FTC. Date of service: 06/16/2009. [6958144] (Arington, Michele) [Entered: 06/16/2009 12:44 PM]
June 9, 2009 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND CADS: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: CADS due by Attorney Lawrence John Semenza II, Attorney due on 06/01/2009. Transcript order for Appellant Interbill, Ltd. and Appellant Thomas Wells due 06/29/2009. Transcript due for Orig Clerk USDC, Las Vegas on 07/29/2009. Certificate of record due 08/05/2009. Appellant Interbill, Ltd. and Appellant Thomas Wells opening brief due 09/14/2009. Appellee Federal Trade Commission answering brief due 10/14/2009. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. (GR) [Entered: 06/09/2009 08:20 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: FTC v. Interbill, Ltd., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Represented By: Michele Arington Esquire
Represented By: Mary T. Benfield
Represented By: John F. Daly Esquire
Represented By: Tracy Sue Thorleifson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: THOMAS WELLS
Represented By: Lawrence John Semenza II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: INTERBILL, LTD.
Represented By: Lawrence John Semenza II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?