Carol Shloss v. Sean Sweeney, et al
| CAROL LOEB SHLOSS |
| SEAN SWEENEY, in his capacity as trustee of the Estate of James Joyce and THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE |
| 09-16397 |
| July 6, 2009 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Copyright |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Order filed (Deputy Clerk: PWS) Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees on appeal. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [7071104] (KKW) |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellants Sean Sweeney and The Estate of James Joyce Stipulated Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 09/22/2009. [7070346] (JLS) |
| Filing 12 Terminated Robert Edward Spoo for appellee in 09-16397 [7054703] (SS) |
| Filing 11 Filed order MEDIATION (PWS): On September 3, 2009, a telephone conference was held with Circuit Mediator Peter W. Sherwood. This appeal is selected for inclusion in the Mediation Program. During the time the appeal remains in the Mediation Program, all procedural matters should be brought to the attention of the Circuit Mediator. On or before October 6, 2009, counsel for appellant is requested to contact the Circuit Mediator to report on the status of the case. [7052087] (KKW) |
| Filing 10 Terminated Lawrence Lessig for Carol Loeb Shloss in 09-16397, David Olson for Carol Loeb Shloss in 09-16397 [7048820] (LN) |
| Filing 9 Filed order MEDIATION (PWS): Due to a conflict that has arisen for the Circuit Mediator, the assessment conference originally scheduled for August 31, 2009, is rescheduled to to September 3, 2009, at 3:00 p.m. PACIFIC (San Francisco) Time. In order to participate, the participants shall call 1-866-208-1296 and give confirmation number 23630349. [7044816] (KKW) |
| Filing 8 Filed order MEDIATION (EPM): This case is under consideration for inclusion in the Mediation Program. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. A settlement assessment conference will be held by telephone on August 31, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC (San Francisco) Time/1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [7014127] (WL) |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellants Sean Sweeney and The Estate of James Joyce Civil Appeals Docketing Statement. Served on 07/06/2009. [6984044] (MT) |
| Filing 6 Filed appearance notice of. Gregory A. Castanias for appellant Sean Sweeney et al. Served on 07/06/2009. [6984000] (MT) |
| Filing 5 Added attorney Gregory Andrew Castanias for Sean Sweeney Carol Loeb Shloss, in case 09-16397. [6983992] (MT) |
| Filing 4 Received Appellant Sean Sweeney and Appellee Carol Loeb Shloss notice regarding intent to order transcripts. [6983981] (MT) |
| Filing 3 Added attorney Jennifer Loraine Swize for Sean Sweeney The Estate of James Joyce, in case 09-16397. [6983974] (MT) |
| Filing 2 Received Appellants Sean Sweeney and The Estate of James Joyce notice regarding representation statement. [6983952] (MT) |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND CADS: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: CADS due by Attorneys Gregory L. Lippetz, Maria Kara Nelson and Anna Raimer, on 06/26/2009. Transcript order for Appellant Sean Sweeney, et al., due 07/27/2009. Transcript due for Orig Clerk USDC, San Jose on 08/25/2009. Certificate of record due 09/01/2009. Appellant Sean Sweeney, et al., opening brief due 10/13/2009. Appellee Carol Loeb Shloss answering brief due 11/10/2009. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [6981425] (EB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
