State of California Department v. Hearthside Residential Corpora
| STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL, a State Agency |
| HEARTHSIDE RESIDENTIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation |
| 09-55389 |
| March 16, 2009 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Environmental Matters |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| State of California Department v. Hearthside Residential Corpora |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: State of California Department v. Hearthside Residential Corpora | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee,: STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL, a State Agency | |
| Represented By: | Donald A. Robinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: HEARTHSIDE RESIDENTIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Marc C. Forsythe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
