Margaret Hoffman, et al v. Construction Protective Servic
| MARGARET A. HOFFMAN, an individual, for herself and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| DANIEL LOPEZ |
| CONSTRUCTION PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation |
| 09-56757 |
| November 9, 2009 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Margaret Hoffman, et al v. Construction Protective Servic | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: MARGARET A. HOFFMAN, an individual, for herself and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Fenja Klaus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff,: DANIEL LOPEZ | |
| Represented By: | Fenja Klaus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: CONSTRUCTION PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation | |
| Represented By: | Howard M. Knee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
