Randy Cabantac v. Eric Holder, Jr.
||RANDY PENARANDA CABANTAC, AKA Randy Reyes
||ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
||May 5, 2009
||U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
|Nature of Suit:
We have the following opinions for this case:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 9, 2013
Filed order (ALEX KOZINSKI, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN and CARLOS T. BEA) ( Dissent to Order by Judge Murguia) Amending Disposition Opinion DENIED. The opinion filed on August 23, 2012, and appearing at 693 F.3d 825, is amended as follows: At slip opinion page 9632, 693 F.3d at 827, replace <Finally, it bears emphasizing that the amended abstract does not necessarily establish that Cabantac pleaded guilty only to the general state offense.> with <The amended abstract is not properly before this court because it was not part of the administrative record on which the order of removal is based. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(b)(4)(A) ( [T]he court of appeals shall decide the petition only on the administrative record on which the order of removal is based. ). However, it bears emphasizing that even the amended abstract does not necessarily establish that Cabantac pleaded guilty only to the general state offense. > With this amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to deny Petitioner s petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. A majority of the non-recused active judges did not vote in favor of rehearing en banc. The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. Judge Murguia s dissent from the denial of en banc rehearing is filed concurrently herewith. No further petitions shall be entertained.  [09-71336, 12-71459]
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?