Roberto Maldonado v. Eric Holder, Jr.
ROBERTO CURINSITA MALDONADO |
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General |
09-71491 |
May 18, 2009 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
ROBERTO MALDONADO V. ERIC HOLDER, JR. |
Maldonado v. Holder |
ROBERTO MALDONADO V. ERIC HOLDER, JR. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9026244650 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (ALEX KOZINSKI) Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. Judges Graber and Friedland did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. [9186415] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Roberto Maldonado v. Eric Holder, Jr. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner,: ROBERTO CURINSITA MALDONADO | |
Represented By: | Haitham Edward Ballout |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent,: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Ronald E. LeFevre |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.