Charles Hedlund v. Charles Ryan
|Petitioner - Appellant,:
||CHARLES MICHAEL HEDLUND
|Respondent - Appellee,:
||CHARLES L. RYAN
||September 25, 2009
||U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty
We have the following opinions for this case:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 13, 2017
Filed order and amended opinion (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, CARLOS T. BEA and N. RANDY SMITH) Opinion by Judge N.R. Smith; Concurrence by Judge Bea; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Wardlaw Amending Disposition Order and Opinion REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART. The opinion filed March 4, 2016, and reported at 815 F.3d 1233, is hereby amended concurrent with the filing of an Amended Opinion today. With these amendments, Judges Bea and N.R. Smith voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wardlaw voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed in response to the amended disposition. 
|September 4, 2014
Filed Order for PUBLICATION (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, CARLOS T. BEA and N. RANDY SMITH) Appellant s petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc, filed June 13, 2014, remains pending. The panel will stay proceedings on the petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc pending resolution of en banc proceedings in McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2013), rehearing en banc granted, 2014 WL 1013859 (Mar. 12, 2014). IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?