Charles Hedlund v. Charles Ryan
Petitioner - Appellant,: CHARLES MICHAEL HEDLUND
Respondent - Appellee,: CHARLES L. RYAN
Case Number: 09-99019
Filed: September 25, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 24, 2014 Summary Hedlund v. Ryan
September 4, 2014 Summary CHARLES HEDLUND V. CHARLES RYAN
March 4, 2016 Summary CHARLES HEDLUND V. CHARLES RYAN
April 13, 2017 Summary Hedlund v. Ryan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9028944705 Filed order and amended opinion (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, CARLOS T. BEA and N. RANDY SMITH) Opinion by Judge N.R. Smith; Concurrence by Judge Bea; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Wardlaw Amending Disposition Order and Opinion REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART. The opinion filed March 4, 2016, and reported at 815 F.3d 1233, is hereby amended concurrent with the filing of an Amended Opinion today. With these amendments, Judges Bea and N.R. Smith voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wardlaw voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed in response to the amended disposition. [10394219]
September 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9026342964 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, CARLOS T. BEA and N. RANDY SMITH) Appellant s petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc, filed June 13, 2014, remains pending. The panel will stay proceedings on the petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc pending resolution of en banc proceedings in McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2013), rehearing en banc granted, 2014 WL 1013859 (Mar. 12, 2014). IT IS SO ORDERED. [9228906]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Hedlund v. Charles Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant,: CHARLES MICHAEL HEDLUND
Represented By: Paula Kay Harms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee,: CHARLES L. RYAN
Represented By: Jon Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?