Scott Clabourne v. Charles Ryan

Scott Clabourne v. Charles Ryan

Petitioner - Appellant,:	SCOTT D. CLABOURNE
Respondent - Appellee,:	CHARLES L. RYAN
Case Number:	09-99022
Filed:	October 21, 2009
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
March 5, 2014	Clabourne v. Ryan
August 1, 2017	SCOTT CLABOURNE V. CHARLES RYAN

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 1, 2017	Filing 9029241857 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (MARSHA S. BERZON, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and SANDRA S. IKUTA) Judges Clifton and Ikuta have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Berzon has voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Ikuta has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Clifton so recommends. Judge Berzon has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are therefore DENIED. Concurrence by Judges Clifton and Ikuta; Dissent by Judge Berzon [10528209]

Date Filed

Document Text

August 1, 2017

Filing 9029241857 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (MARSHA S. BERZON, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and SANDRA S. IKUTA) Judges Clifton and Ikuta have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Berzon has voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Ikuta has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Clifton so recommends. Judge Berzon has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are therefore DENIED. Concurrence by Judges Clifton and Ikuta; Dissent by Judge Berzon [10528209]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Scott Clabourne v. Charles Ryan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant,: SCOTT D. CLABOURNE
Represented By:	S. Jonathan Young
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent - appellee,: CHARLES L. RYAN
Represented By:	Amy Pignatella Cain
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?