Conrad Zapien v. Robert Wong
| CONRAD ZAPIEN |
| ROBERT K. WONG |
| 09-99023 |
| October 22, 2009 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Zapien v. Martel
|
|
Zapien v. Martel
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9028623444
Filed order and amended opinion (ALEX KOZINSKI, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and MARY H. MURGUIA). The opinion filed November 9, 2015, and appearing at 805 F.3d 862, is AMENDED as reflected in the attached amended opinion. The petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc is DENIED. No additional petitions for rehearing are permitted; Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED. [10235989]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Conrad Zapien v. Robert Wong | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant,: CONRAD ZAPIEN | |
| Represented By: | Jay Lawrence Lichtman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee,: ROBERT K. WONG | |
| Represented By: | Thomas C. Hsieh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
