Elizabeth Haskell, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
| ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL, REGINALD ENTO, JEFFREY PATRICK LYONS, Jr. and AAKASH DESAI, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated |
| EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of California and EVA STEINBERGER, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs, California Department of Justice |
| FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA |
| 10-15152 |
| January 22, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Haskell, et al. v. Brown, Jr., et al.
|
|
ELIZABETH HASKELL V. KAMALA D. HARRIS
|
|
ELIZABETH HASKELL V. KAMALA D. HARRIS
|
|
ELIZABETH HASKELL V. KAMALA D. HARRIS
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9025223538
Filed Order for PUBLICATION (ALEX KOZINSKI) n light of Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. ___ , No. 12-207 (June 3, 2013) and the parties supplemental briefs, this case will be re-argued before the en banc court during the week of December 9, 2013, in San Francisco, California. The date and time will be determined by separate order. For further information or special requests regarding scheduling, please contact Deputy Clerk Paul Keller at paul_keller@ca9.uscourts.gov or (415) 355-8026. The court grants leave pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 29(a) to any amicus wishing to file a brief bearing on the issues to be re-argued, so long as it is filed no later than October 28, 2013, and does not exceed 2,500 words. [8742351]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
