James O'Hines v. ADOC, et al
JAMES LYNN O'HINES, AKA Jackson Malloy |
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, named as Arizona Dept. of Corrections in original complaint and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as S.S.U. Squad c/os Warden & Ombudsman(s) Investigators of Regional Union Contract(s) in orignal complaint |
10-15746 |
April 7, 2010 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: James O'Hines v. ADOC, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant,: JAMES LYNN O'HINES, AKA Jackson Malloy | |
Represented By: | James Lynn O'Hines |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee,: ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, named as Arizona Dept. of Corrections in original complaint | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee,: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as S.S.U. Squad c/os Warden & Ombudsman(s) Investigators of Regional Union Contract(s) in orignal complaint | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.