Center for Environmental Law a, et al v. United States Bureau of Reclam, et al
| CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY, a Washington non-profit corporation and COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER, a Washington non-profit corporation |
| VISION FOR OUR FUTURE |
| UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, an agency of the Department of Interior and MICHAEL L. CONNOR, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation |
| EAST COLUMBIA BASIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT and WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY |
| 10-35646 |
| July 23, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Environmental Matters |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Center for Environmental Law and Policy, et al. v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Center for Environmental Law a, et al v. United States Bureau of Reclam, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY, a Washington non-profit corporation | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Winter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER, a Washington non-profit corporation | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Winter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner-intervenor,: VISION FOR OUR FUTURE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, an agency of the Department of Interior | |
| Represented By: | Charles Ray Shockey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: MICHAEL L. CONNOR, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation | |
| Represented By: | Charles Ray Shockey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Intervenor-defendant - appellee,: EAST COLUMBIA BASIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Lynn Kenison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Intervenor-defendant - appellee,: WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J. Young |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
