Frank Quintana v. Daniel Lundgren, et al
| FRANK QUINTANA |
| DANIEL J. LUNDGREN, Attorney General of the State of California and GIL GARCETTI, District Attorney, District Attorney of Los Angeles County |
| 10-55695 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Frank Quintana v. Daniel Lundgren, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant,: FRANK QUINTANA | |
| Represented By: | Frank Quintana |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee,: DANIEL J. LUNDGREN, Attorney General of the State of California | |
| Represented By: | Karen Bissonnette |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee,: GIL GARCETTI, District Attorney, District Attorney of Los Angeles County | |
| Represented By: | Brad Douglas Levenson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
