DeArcey Stewart v. James Tilton, et al
| DEARCEY JAMUL STEWART |
| JAMES E. TILTON and MATTHEW CATE |
| 10-55985 |
| June 21, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Stewart v. Cate
|
|
DEARCEY STEWART V. MATTHEW CATE
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9025997195
Filed order and amended opinion (MARSHA S. BERZON, SANDRA S. IKUTA and JENNIFER G. ZIPPS). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED; The opinion and dissent filed on November 1, 2013, and appearing at 734 F.3d 995, are amended. The superseding amended opinion and dissent will be filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judge Ikuta voted to deny the appellant s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, and Judge Zipps so recommended. Judge Berzon voted to grant both petitions. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Appellant s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. [9078939]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
