Daniel Larsen v. Derral Adam

Daniel Larsen v. Derral Adam

Petitioner - Appellee,:	DANIEL LARSEN
Respondent - Appellant,:	DERRAL G. ADAMS
Case Number:	10-56118
Filed:	July 14, 2010
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
September 16, 2013	Larsen v. Soto
November 20, 2013	DANIEL LARSEN V. JOHN SOTO

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 20, 2013	Filing 9025516378 Filed order and amended opinion (WILLIAM C. CANBY, STEPHEN R. REINHARDT and KIM MCLANE WARDLAW). The opinion filed September 16, 2013, is hereby AMENDED as follows: (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) With the opinion thus amended, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Reinhardt and Wardlaw have voted to deny the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Canby has recommended denial. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. No active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [8869545]

Date Filed

Document Text

November 20, 2013

Filing 9025516378 Filed order and amended opinion (WILLIAM C. CANBY, STEPHEN R. REINHARDT and KIM MCLANE WARDLAW). The opinion filed September 16, 2013, is hereby AMENDED as follows: (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) With the opinion thus amended, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Reinhardt and Wardlaw have voted to deny the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Canby has recommended denial. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. No active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [8869545]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Larsen v. Derral Adam
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee,: DANIEL LARSEN
Represented By:	Justin Brooks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent - appellant,: DERRAL G. ADAMS
Represented By:	Deborah Chuang
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?