Daniel Larsen v. Derral Adam
|Petitioner - Appellee,:
|Respondent - Appellant,:
||DERRAL G. ADAMS
||July 14, 2010
||U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
|Nature of Suit:
We have the following opinions for this case:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 20, 2013
Filed order and amended opinion (WILLIAM C. CANBY, STEPHEN R. REINHARDT and KIM MCLANE WARDLAW). The opinion filed September 16, 2013, is hereby AMENDED as follows: (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) With the opinion thus amended, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Reinhardt and Wardlaw have voted to deny the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Canby has recommended denial. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. No active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained. 
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?