Stephen Harris, et al v. United States Bankruptcy Court
Petitioner - Appellant: STEPHEN T. HARRIS and DAVID WOOLSEY
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: 10-56473
Filed: September 20, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 10, 2012 STEPHEN HARRIS V. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stephen Harris, et al v. United States Bankruptcy Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: STEPHEN T. HARRIS
Represented By: Roger Sandberg Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: DAVID WOOLSEY
Represented By: Roger Sandberg Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?