Robert Plumleigh, et al v. City of Santa Ana, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant,: ROBERT PLUMLEIGH, Individually, on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, as aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA") and THOMAS R. HAZARD, III, Individually, on behalf of othe members of the general public similarly situated, and as aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA")
Defendant - Appellee,: CITY OF SANTA ANA, PAUL M. WALTERS, JOSEPH W. FLETCHER, REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation and REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation
Case Number: 10-57035
Filed: December 27, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Plumleigh, et al v. City of Santa Ana, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: ROBERT PLUMLEIGH, Individually, on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, as aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA")
Represented By: Aaron Aftergood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: THOMAS R. HAZARD, III, Individually, on behalf of othe members of the general public similarly situated, and as aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA")
Represented By: Aaron Aftergood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: CITY OF SANTA ANA
Represented By: Steven J. Rothans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: PAUL M. WALTERS
Represented By: Steven J. Rothans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: JOSEPH W. FLETCHER
Represented By: Steven J. Rothans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Gregory P. Barbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation
Represented By: Gregory P. Barbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?