Morrell Neely v. USDC-Los Angeles
MORRELL S. NEELY |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES |
In re: MORRELL S. NEELY, ERIC SAMBOLD and RUDOLPH SAMBOLD |
10-73010 |
October 1, 2010 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Deleted Incorrect Entry [8013019] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 12/27/2011 03:29 PM] |
Filing 5 Order filed (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, STEPHEN S. TROTT and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER): Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. No motions for reconsideration, modification, or clarification of this order shall be filed or entertained. [7506220] (AF) [Entered: 10/13/2010 10:59 AM] |
Filing 4 Respondent USDC-NVL in 10-73010 substituted by Respondent USDC-CALA in 10-73010 [7504449] (HH) [Entered: 10/12/2010 11:36 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed Real Parties in Interest Eric Sambold, Rudolph Sambold and Respondent USDC-NVL reply to emergency petition for writ of mandamus with supporting declaration of Eric Sambold and points and authorities thereon. no proof of service. [7495978] (JFF) [Entered: 10/04/2010 02:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER) Petitioners motion for a stay pending disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 129 S. Ct. 365, 374 (2008) (requiring that a party seeking an injunction establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits of the underlying claim). The petition for a writ of mandamus will be addressed by separate order. [7494818] (KD) [Entered: 10/01/2010 04:57 PM] |
Filing 1 FILED EMERGENCY (faxed) PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [7493946] (HC) [Entered: 10/01/2010 11:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.