USA v. Marcel King

USA v. Marcel King

Plaintiff - Appellee,:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant,:	MARCEL DARON KING
Case Number:	11-10182
Filed:	April 12, 2011
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
March 13, 2012	United States v. King
May 24, 2012	USA V MARCEL KING
August 1, 2012	United States v. King
March 8, 2013	USA V. MARCEL KING
August 27, 2013	USA V. MARCEL KING

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 27, 2013	Filing 9025259546 Filed order and amended opinion (SUSAN P. GRABER, MARSHA S. BERZON and RICHARD C. TALLMAN). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED; (See document for complete text). The opinion filed March 8, 2013, and published at 711 F.3d 986, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judges Graber and Tallman have voted to deny Appellant s petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Berzon has voted to grant it. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Appellant s petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or for rehearing en banc shall be entertained.[8757505]
August 1, 2012	Filing 9024124648 Filed per curiam opinion (ALEX KOZINSKI, HARRY PREGERSON, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, RICHARD A. PAEZ, MARSHA S. BERZON, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, SANDRA S. IKUTA and N. RANDY SMITH) United States v. King, 672 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2012), is vacated, and the case is referred to the original panel for disposition consistent with this opinion. [8270771]

Date Filed

Document Text

August 27, 2013

Filing 9025259546 Filed order and amended opinion (SUSAN P. GRABER, MARSHA S. BERZON and RICHARD C. TALLMAN). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED; (See document for complete text). The opinion filed March 8, 2013, and published at 711 F.3d 986, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judges Graber and Tallman have voted to deny Appellant s petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Berzon has voted to grant it. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Appellant s petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or for rehearing en banc shall be entertained.[8757505]

August 1, 2012

Filing 9024124648 Filed per curiam opinion (ALEX KOZINSKI, HARRY PREGERSON, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, RICHARD A. PAEZ, MARSHA S. BERZON, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, SANDRA S. IKUTA and N. RANDY SMITH) United States v. King, 672 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2012), is vacated, and the case is referred to the original panel for disposition consistent with this opinion. [8270771]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Marcel King
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee,: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	William Frentzen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellant,: MARCEL DARON KING
Represented By:	Daniel Blank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?