Ralph Nader, et al v. Kenneth Bennett
Plaintiff - Appellant,: RALPH NADER and DONALD N. DAIEN
Defendant - Appellee,: KENNETH BENNETT, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State
Case Number: 11-15548
Filed: March 8, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Voting

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 2, 2012 RALPH NADER V. KENNETH BENNETT

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ralph Nader, et al v. Kenneth Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: RALPH NADER
Represented By: Robert Edward Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: DONALD N. DAIEN
Represented By: Robert Edward Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: KENNETH BENNETT, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State
Represented By: James Evans Barton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?