Daniel Kaffer, et al v. Netflix, Inc., et al
JUSTIN MEADOWS, ROSEMARY PIERSON, REBECCA SILVERMAN, ALAN LEVY, JASON LAWTON and DANIEL KAFFER |
In re: ONLINE DVD RENTAL ANTITRUST LITIGATION |
NETFLIX, INC., WALMART.COM USA LLC and WALMART INC. |
11-17228 |
September 20, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Antitrust |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LKK) The parties stipulation to voluntarily dismiss this appeal with prejudice is granted. This appeal is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). Each parties is to bear its own cost to the appeal. A copy of this order sent to the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [8065756] (BJB) [Entered: 02/13/2012 09:47 AM] |
Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellant Daniel Kaffer Stipulated Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 02/10/2012. [8064710] (Abrams, Robert) [Entered: 02/10/2012 01:22 PM] |
Filing 11 Added attorney Lawrence C. DiNardo for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Walmart.com USA LLC, in case 11-17228. [8034625] (CW) [Entered: 01/18/2012 08:03 AM] |
Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Paula W. Render for Appellees Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Walmart.com USA LLC. Date of service: 01/17/2012. [8034302] (Render, Paula) [Entered: 01/17/2012 04:12 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner) The court has received and reviewed the response to this courts September 30, 2011 order to show cause. The jurisdictional issue does not appear suitable for summary disposition. Accordingly, the order to show cause is discharged. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due February 13, 2012; the answering brief is due March 14, 2012; and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. (MOATT) [8028699] (BJB) [Entered: 01/11/2012 04:16 PM] |
Filing 8 Terminated Kashan Y. Cauley for Netflix, Inc. in 11-17228 [8011092] (CW) [Entered: 12/23/2011 07:33 AM] |
Filing 7 Added attorney Jonathan M. Jacobson, Keith Edward Eggleton for Netflix, Inc., in case 11-17228. [8011091] (CW) [Entered: 12/23/2011 07:32 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jonathan M. Jacobson; David H. Reichenberg; Keith E. Eggleton; Maura L. Rees; Dylan J. Liddiard; Anthony J Weibell for Appellee Netflix, Inc.. Date of service: 12/22/2011. [8010763] (Weibell, Anthony) [Entered: 12/22/2011 03:29 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Daniel Kaffer, Jason Lawton, Alan Levy, Justin Meadows, Rosemary Pierson and Rebecca Silverman response to order to show cause dated 09/30/2011. Date of service: 10/21/2011. [7936847] (Abrams, Robert) [Entered: 10/21/2011 06:57 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed order MOATT: (KB) 54(b) order to show cause...If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [7911859] (KD) [Entered: 09/30/2011 11:32 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Daniel Kaffer, Jason Lawton, Alan Levy, Justin Meadows, Rosemary Pierson and Rebecca Silverman Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/26/2011. [7905919] (Abrams, Robert) [Entered: 09/26/2011 11:33 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee Netflix, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/21/2011. [7900797] (Jacobson, Jonathan) [Entered: 09/21/2011 06:36 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/27/2011. Transcript ordered by 10/12/2011. Transcript due 11/14/2011. Appellants Daniel Kaffer, Jason Lawton, Alan Levy, Justin Meadows, Rosemary Pierson, Rebecca Silverman opening brief due 12/21/2011. Appellees Netflix, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walmart.com USA LLC answering brief due 01/20/2012. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7899499] (RT) [Entered: 09/20/2011 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.