Yolanda Quihuis, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Yolanda Quihuis, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I

Yolanda Quihuis, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I

Plaintiff - Appellant,:	YOLANDA E. QUIHUIS and ROBERT QUIHUIS, a married couple
Defendant - Appellee,:	STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation
Case Number:	11-18067
Filed:	December 29, 2011
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Insurance

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
April 4, 2014	YOLANDA QUIHUIS V. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE I
May 6, 2014	YOLANDA QUIHUIS V. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE I
December 24, 2014	YOLANDA QUIHUIS V. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE I

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 6, 2014	Filing 9026009080 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, SANDRA S. IKUTA and ANDREW P. GORDON) The certification order filed on April 4, 2014, is amended as follows: 1. At page 7, lines 15 17, delete <<while the Coxes were best served to admit ownership in order to obtain an agreement from the Bojorquezes not to execute a judgment against them>> and insert <<while the Coxes were best served to admit ownership in order to obtain an agreement from the Quihuises not to execute a judgment against them>>. 2. At page 8, lines 5 7, delete <<More specifically, the issue is whether the stipulation (and the subsequent default judgment) between the Coxes and the Bojorquezes that the Coxes owned the Jeep>> and insert <<More specifically, the issue is whether the stipulation (and the subsequent default judgment) between the Coxes and the Quihuises that the Coxes owned the Jeep>>. [9084034]
April 4, 2014	Filing 9025918016 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, SANDRA S. IKUTA and ANDREW P. GORDON) We respectfully request that the Supreme Court of Arizona exercise its discretion to decide the certified question set forth in Part II of this order. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) If the Arizona Supreme Court accepts review of the certified question, the Quihuises and State Farm may file briefs in accord with Arizona Supreme Court Rule 27(d). The Clerk of Court is hereby ordered to transmit forthwith to the Arizona Supreme Court, under official seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a copy of this order and all briefs and excerpts of record pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute 12-1861 and Arizona Supreme Court Rule 27(a). Further proceedings in this court are stayed pending the Arizona Supreme Court s decision whether it will accept review and, if so, receipt of the answer to the certified question. The case is withdrawn from submission until further order from this court. The panel will resume control and jurisdiction upon receipt of an answer to the certified question or upon the Arizona Supreme Court s decision to decline to answer the certified question. When the Arizona Supreme Court decides whether or not to accept the certified question, the parties shall file a joint status report informing this court of the decision. If the Arizona Supreme Court accepts the certified question, the parties shall file a joint status report informing this court when the Arizona Supreme Court issues its answer. It is so ORDERED. [9044204]

Date Filed

Document Text

May 6, 2014

Filing 9026009080 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, SANDRA S. IKUTA and ANDREW P. GORDON) The certification order filed on April 4, 2014, is amended as follows: 1. At page 7, lines 15 17, delete <<while the Coxes were best served to admit ownership in order to obtain an agreement from the Bojorquezes not to execute a judgment against them>> and insert <<while the Coxes were best served to admit ownership in order to obtain an agreement from the Quihuises not to execute a judgment against them>>. 2. At page 8, lines 5 7, delete <<More specifically, the issue is whether the stipulation (and the subsequent default judgment) between the Coxes and the Bojorquezes that the Coxes owned the Jeep>> and insert <<More specifically, the issue is whether the stipulation (and the subsequent default judgment) between the Coxes and the Quihuises that the Coxes owned the Jeep>>. [9084034]

April 4, 2014

Filing 9025918016 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, SANDRA S. IKUTA and ANDREW P. GORDON) We respectfully request that the Supreme Court of Arizona exercise its discretion to decide the certified question set forth in Part II of this order. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) If the Arizona Supreme Court accepts review of the certified question, the Quihuises and State Farm may file briefs in accord with Arizona Supreme Court Rule 27(d). The Clerk of Court is hereby ordered to transmit forthwith to the Arizona Supreme Court, under official seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a copy of this order and all briefs and excerpts of record pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute 12-1861 and Arizona Supreme Court Rule 27(a). Further proceedings in this court are stayed pending the Arizona Supreme Court s decision whether it will accept review and, if so, receipt of the answer to the certified question. The case is withdrawn from submission until further order from this court. The panel will resume control and jurisdiction upon receipt of an answer to the certified question or upon the Arizona Supreme Court s decision to decline to answer the certified question. When the Arizona Supreme Court decides whether or not to accept the certified question, the parties shall file a joint status report informing this court of the decision. If the Arizona Supreme Court accepts the certified question, the parties shall file a joint status report informing this court when the Arizona Supreme Court issues its answer. It is so ORDERED. [9044204]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Yolanda Quihuis, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: YOLANDA E. QUIHUIS
Represented By:	Jeffrey A. Imig
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: ROBERT QUIHUIS, a married couple
Represented By:	Jeffrey A. Imig
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation
Represented By:	David M. Bell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?