USA v. Dan Petri
|Plaintiff - Appellee,:
||UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|Defendant - Appellant,:
||November 23, 2011
||U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
|Nature of Suit:
We have the following opinions for this case:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 12, 2013
Filed order and amended opinion (MARY M. SCHROEDER, M. MARGARET MCKEOWN and RICHARD C. TALLMAN).The Opinion filed on February 8, 2013, is amended as follows: Slip opinion page 11, line 21: At the end of this paragraph, insert the following sentence: <In addition, Petri acknowledges that the prior version of Rule 32 covered only objections to the presentence report, and the Advisory Committee made clear that the 2002 amendments were not intended to change the meaning of Rule 32 in ways other than explained in the notes. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 advisory committee s note ( These changes are intended to be stylistic only, except as noted below. ).> With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing; Judges McKeown and Tallman have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Schroeder so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained. AFFIRMED. 
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?