Experience Hendrix LLC, et al v. HendrixLicensing.com Ltd, et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Experience Hendrix LLC, et al v. HendrixLicensing.com Ltd, et al

Experience Hendrix LLC, et al v. HendrixLicensing.com Ltd, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant,:	EXPERIENCE HENDRIX LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company and AUTHENTIC HENDRIX LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company
Defendant - Appellee,:	HENDRIXLICENSING.COM LTD, a Nevada Corporation, DBA Hendrix Artwork, DBA Hendrixartwork.com, ANDREW PITSICALIS, an individual and CHRISTINE RUTH FLAHERTY
Case Number:	11-35858
Filed:	October 18, 2011
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Trademark

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
January 29, 2014	Experience Hendrix v. HendrixLicensing.com
August 8, 2014	EXPERIENCE HENDRIX LLC V. HENDRIXLICENSING.COM LTD

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 8, 2014	Filing 9026272527 Filed order and amended opinion (DAVID M. EBEL, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED;The Opinion filed January 29, 2014, appearing at 742 F.3d 377, is amended sua sponte to remove footnote 6. A copy of the our amended decision and original concurrence is attached to this Order and filed concurrently with this Order. With this amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to DENY the petition for REHEARING and the petition for REHEARING EN BANC. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter. Fed. R.App. P.35. The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [9198597] [11-35858, 11-35872]

Date Filed

Document Text

August 8, 2014

Filing 9026272527 Filed order and amended opinion (DAVID M. EBEL, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED;The Opinion filed January 29, 2014, appearing at 742 F.3d 377, is amended sua sponte to remove footnote 6. A copy of the our amended decision and original concurrence is attached to this Order and filed concurrently with this Order. With this amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to DENY the petition for REHEARING and the petition for REHEARING EN BANC. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter. Fed. R.App. P.35. The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [9198597] [11-35858, 11-35872]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Experience Hendrix LLC, et al v. HendrixLicensing.com Ltd, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: EXPERIENCE HENDRIX LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company
Represented By:	Karen Wetherell Davis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: AUTHENTIC HENDRIX LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company
Represented By:	Karen Wetherell Davis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: HENDRIXLICENSING.COM LTD, a Nevada Corporation, DBA Hendrix Artwork, DBA Hendrixartwork.com
Represented By:	Thomas Osinski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: ANDREW PITSICALIS, an individual
Represented By:	Thomas Osinski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: CHRISTINE RUTH FLAHERTY
Represented By:	Thomas Osinski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?