USA v. Roberto Bustos-Ochoa

USA v. Roberto Bustos-Ochoa

Plaintiff - Appellee,:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant,:	ROBERTO BUSTOS-OCHOA
Case Number:	11-50471
Filed:	November 3, 2011
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
December 18, 2012	United States v. Bustos-Ochoa
April 22, 2013	USA V. ROBERTO BUSTOS-OCHOA

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 22, 2013	Filing 9024880896 Filed order (DOROTHY W. NELSON, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN and JAMES K. SINGLETON) Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED; The opinion filed in this case on December 18, 2012 is hereby amended as follows: (see order for full text) With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge O Scannlain has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Nelson and Singleton have so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [8597436]

Date Filed

Document Text

April 22, 2013

Filing 9024880896 Filed order (DOROTHY W. NELSON, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN and JAMES K. SINGLETON) Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED; The opinion filed in this case on December 18, 2012 is hereby amended as follows: (see order for full text) With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge O Scannlain has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Nelson and Singleton have so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [8597436]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Roberto Bustos-Ochoa
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee,: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	Sara J. O'Connell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellant,: ROBERTO BUSTOS-OCHOA
Represented By:	Paul A. Barr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?