Durrell Puckett v. Derral Adams, et al
| DURRELL PUCKETT, AKA Durrell Anthony Puckett |
| DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden of Corcoran State Prison and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION |
| 11-55029 |
| January 5, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Durrell Puckett v. Derral Adams, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant,: DURRELL PUCKETT, AKA Durrell Anthony Puckett | |
| Represented By: | Durrell Puckett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee,: DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden of Corcoran State Prison | |
| Represented By: | Ryan M. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee,: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION | |
| Represented By: | Ryan M. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
