Shawndee Hartless, et al v. Clorox Company
Plaintiff - Appellee,: SHAWNDEE HARTLESS, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and the General Public
Objector - Appellant,: OMAR RIVERO
Defendant - Appellee,: CLOROX COMPANY
Case Number: 11-55150
Filed: January 25, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Shawndee Hartless, et al v. Clorox Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee,: SHAWNDEE HARTLESS, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and the General Public
Represented By: Timothy G. Blood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Objector - appellant,: OMAR RIVERO
Represented By: Christopher Andres Bandas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: CLOROX COMPANY
Represented By: Adam G. Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?