Larry Beauchamp v. City of Long Beach

Larry Beauchamp v. City of Long Beach

Plaintiff - Appellant,:	LARRY BEAUCHAMP
Defendant - Appellee,:	CITY OF LONG BEACH
Case Number:	11-55780
Filed:	May 13, 2011
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
September 17, 2013	LARRY BEAUCHAMP V. CITY OF LONG BEACH
October 2, 2013	LARRY BEAUCHAMP V. CITY OF LONG BEACH
May 21, 2014	LARRY BEAUCHAMP V. CITY OF LONG BEACH

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 17, 2013	Filing 9025325676 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, SANDRA S. IKUTA and ANDREW D. HURWITZ) for certification to California State Supreme Court., We respectfully request that the Supreme Court of California exercise its discretion to decide the certified questions set forth in Part II of this order. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) The clerk of this court is hereby directed to file in the California Supreme Court, under official seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, copies of all relevant briefs and excerpts of the record, and an original and ten copies of the request with a certification of service on the parties, pursuant to California Rules of Court 8.548(c), (d). Further proceedings before us are stayed pending the California Supreme Court s decision regarding certification, and in the event the California Supreme Court accepts certification, pending our receipt of the answers to the questions certified. Submission of this case is withdrawn. After the California Supreme Court makes its determination whether to accept certification of these questions, the parties shall file a joint report informing this court of the decision. If the California Supreme Court accepts the certified questions, the parties shall file a joint status report to our court every six months after the date of acceptance, or more frequently if circumstances warrant. If the California Supreme Court denies the request for certification, this case will be automatically resubmitted upon notice of that denial. If the California Supreme Court accepts the certified question, the case will be automatically resubmitted upon receipt of the California Supreme Court s answer to the certified question. SO ORDERED. [8785884]

Date Filed

Document Text

September 17, 2013

Filing 9025325676 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, SANDRA S. IKUTA and ANDREW D. HURWITZ) for certification to California State Supreme Court., We respectfully request that the Supreme Court of California exercise its discretion to decide the certified questions set forth in Part II of this order. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) The clerk of this court is hereby directed to file in the California Supreme Court, under official seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, copies of all relevant briefs and excerpts of the record, and an original and ten copies of the request with a certification of service on the parties, pursuant to California Rules of Court 8.548(c), (d). Further proceedings before us are stayed pending the California Supreme Court s decision regarding certification, and in the event the California Supreme Court accepts certification, pending our receipt of the answers to the questions certified. Submission of this case is withdrawn. After the California Supreme Court makes its determination whether to accept certification of these questions, the parties shall file a joint report informing this court of the decision. If the California Supreme Court accepts the certified questions, the parties shall file a joint status report to our court every six months after the date of acceptance, or more frequently if circumstances warrant. If the California Supreme Court denies the request for certification, this case will be automatically resubmitted upon notice of that denial. If the California Supreme Court accepts the certified question, the case will be automatically resubmitted upon receipt of the California Supreme Court s answer to the certified question. SO ORDERED. [8785884]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Larry Beauchamp v. City of Long Beach
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: LARRY BEAUCHAMP
Represented By:	Patricia Barbosa
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: CITY OF LONG BEACH
Represented By:	Monte H. Manchit
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?