Antonio Hinojos v. Kohl's Corporation, et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Antonio Hinojos v. Kohl's Corporation, et al

Antonio Hinojos v. Kohl's Corporation, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant,:	ANTONIO S. HINOJOS, Individually and On behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee,:	KOHL'S CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation and KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation
Case Number:	11-55793
Filed:	May 17, 2011
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
May 21, 2013	Hinojos v. Kohl's Corp., et al.
July 8, 2013	ANTONIO HINOJOS V. KOHL'S CORPORATION

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 8, 2013	Filing 9025107503 Filed order (STEPHEN R. REINHARDT, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and RICHARD A. PAEZ) Amending Disposition Opinion REVERSED AND REMANDED;The majority opinion filed May 21, 2013, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Footnote 6, Slip. Op. at 11, is deleted. With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied. The petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [8693226]

Date Filed

Document Text

July 8, 2013

Filing 9025107503 Filed order (STEPHEN R. REINHARDT, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and RICHARD A. PAEZ) Amending Disposition Opinion REVERSED AND REMANDED;The majority opinion filed May 21, 2013, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Footnote 6, Slip. Op. at 11, is deleted. With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied. The petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [8693226]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Antonio Hinojos v. Kohl's Corporation, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: ANTONIO S. HINOJOS, Individually and On behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Represented By:	Derek J. Emge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: KOHL'S CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation
Represented By:	James Speyer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By:	James Speyer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?