Stephen Shoemaker v. Robert Taylor

Stephen Shoemaker v. Robert Taylor

Petitioner - Appellant,:	STEPHEN P. SHOEMAKER
Respondent - Appellee,:	ROBERT TAYLOR, Chief Probation Officer for the City and County of Los Angeles
Case Number:	11-56476
Filed:	August 30, 2011
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
August 6, 2013	Shoemaker v. Taylor
September 13, 2013	STEPHEN SHOEMAKER V. ROBERT TAYLOR

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 13, 2013	Filing 9025314615 Filed order and amended opinion (HARRY PREGERSON, RICHARD A. PAEZ and ANDREW D. HURWITZ). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED. The Opinion filed on August 6, 2013 is amended as follows: On slip opinion page 5, line 4, remove the following text: <Other than the eight images that formed the basis of Shoemaker s child pornography convictions, the seized images were adult rather than child pornography.> On page 5, line 4, insert the following text: <Eight of those images formed the basis for Shoemaker s child pornography convictions.> An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. [8780804]

Date Filed

Document Text

September 13, 2013

Filing 9025314615 Filed order and amended opinion (HARRY PREGERSON, RICHARD A. PAEZ and ANDREW D. HURWITZ). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED. The Opinion filed on August 6, 2013 is amended as follows: On slip opinion page 5, line 4, remove the following text: <Other than the eight images that formed the basis of Shoemaker s child pornography convictions, the seized images were adult rather than child pornography.> On page 5, line 4, insert the following text: <Eight of those images formed the basis for Shoemaker s child pornography convictions.> An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. [8780804]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stephen Shoemaker v. Robert Taylor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant,: STEPHEN P. SHOEMAKER
Represented By:	William Genego
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent - appellee,: ROBERT TAYLOR, Chief Probation Officer for the City and County of Los Angeles
Represented By:	Kenneth Charles Byrne
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?