Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual |
WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME MUNSON, AKA Poet Name Life, UMG RECORDINGS, INC., INTERSCOPE RECORDS, EMI APRIL MUSIC, INC., STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC, WILL.I.AM MUSIC, LLC, JEEPNEY MUSIC, INC., TAB MAGNETIC PUBLISHING and CHERRY RIVER MUSIC CO. |
11-56921 |
November 1, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Copyright |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Ebony Latrice Batts and Manfred Mohr Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/04/2011. [7955437] (CCH) |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/08/2011. Transcript ordered by 11/30/2011. Transcript due 02/28/2012. Appellants Ebony Latrice Batts, Manfred Mohr opening brief due 04/09/2012. Appellees William Adams Jr., Cherry River Music Co., EMI April Music, Inc., Stacy Ferguson, Jaime Gomez, Headphone Junkie Publishing, LLC, Interscope Records, Jeepney Music, Inc., Jaime Munson, Allan Pineda, Tab Magnetic Publishing, UMG Recordings, Inc., Will.I.Am Music, LLC answering brief due 05/09/2012. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7949652] (JN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.