Dominique Whitaker, et al v. USDC-CALA
DOMINIQUE WHITAKER, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, the general public and as an "aggrieved employee" under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act and JOHN WHITE, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, the general public and as an "aggrieved employee" under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES |
In re: DOMINIQUE WHITAKER, JOHN WHITE, COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of California, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of California and COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC, a New York corporation |
11-73146 |
October 20, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Filed order (HARRY PREGERSON, WILLIAM C. CANBY and KIM MCLANE WARDLAW) Our review of the petition, the response, and the reply indicates that petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, we deny the petition. DENIED. [8139349] (WL) [Entered: 04/13/2012 11:28 AM] |
Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Petitioners Dominique Whitaker and John White citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 02/02/2012. [8054472] (Thierman, Mark) [Entered: 02/02/2012 12:57 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Petitioners Dominique Whitaker and John White reply to answer to Writ of Mandamus petition. Date of service: 01/30/2012. [8050403] (Thierman, Mark) [Entered: 01/30/2012 06:40 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Real Parties in Interest Bank of America Corporation, Countrywide Financial Corporation and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. answer to Writ of Mandamus petition. Date of service: 01/25/2012. [8044987] (Kane, Matthew) [Entered: 01/25/2012 06:19 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Petitioners Dominique Whitaker and John White Correspondence: Notice of errata to Notice of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 01/20/2012. [8039805]--[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect content of filing. Resent NDA. 01/23/2012 by GD] (Thierman, Mark) [Entered: 01/20/2012 03:58 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) - Dominique Whitaker, John White and Petitioners Dominique Whitaker and John White citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 01/19/2012. [8038224] (Thierman, Mark) [Entered: 01/19/2012 05:10 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, BARRY G. SILVERMAN and RICHARD A. PAEZ) This petition for a writ of mandamus raises issues that warrant a response. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(b). Accordingly, within 14 days after the date of this order, the real parties in interest shall file a response. The district court, within 14 days after the date of this order, may file a response if it so desires. Petitioners may file a reply within 5 days after service of the response(s). The petition, response(s) and any reply shall be referred to the next available motions panel. [8027924] (KD) [Entered: 01/11/2012 12:15 PM] |
Filing 3 Added attorney Michael D. Mandel for Countrywide Financial Corporation Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Bank of America Corporation, in case 11-73146. [7936504] (JFF) [Entered: 10/20/2011 03:46 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michael D. Mandel for Real Parties in Interest Bank of America Corporation, Countrywide Financial Corporation and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.. Date of service: 10/20/2011. [7936477] (Mandel, Michael) [Entered: 10/20/2011 03:37 PM] |
Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [7935614] (HC) [Entered: 10/20/2011 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Dominique Whitaker, et al v. USDC-CALA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not classified by court: In re: DOMINIQUE WHITAKER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not classified by court: JOHN WHITE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not classified by court: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of California | |
Represented By: | Matthew Kane |
Represented By: | Michael D. Mandel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not classified by court: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of California | |
Represented By: | Matthew Kane |
Represented By: | Michael D. Mandel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not classified by court: COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC, a New York corporation | |
Represented By: | Matthew Kane |
Represented By: | Michael D. Mandel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: DOMINIQUE WHITAKER, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, the general public and as an "aggrieved employee" under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act | |
Represented By: | Paul T. Cullen |
Represented By: | Craig S. Pynes Esquire |
Represented By: | Chaim Shaun Setareh |
Represented By: | Mark Russell Thierman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: JOHN WHITE, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, the general public and as an "aggrieved employee" under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act | |
Represented By: | Paul T. Cullen |
Represented By: | Craig S. Pynes Esquire |
Represented By: | Chaim Shaun Setareh |
Represented By: | Mark Russell Thierman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.