Eric Moore, et al v. Roadway Express, Inc., et al
| ERIC MOORE, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated current and former employees of Roadway Express, Inc., BARBA DIEGO, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated current and former employees of Roadway Express, Inc., LAMAR JOHNSON, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated current and former employees of Roadway Express, Inc. and DARRELL SHERIDAN, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated current and former employees of Roadway Express, Inc. |
| ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., N/K/A YRC Inc., YRC WORLDWIDE INC., YRC INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 20 |
| 11-80002 |
| January 5, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Order filed (EDWARD LEAVY and JAY S. BYBEE) The court, in its discretion, denies the petition for permission to appeal the district courts December 22, 2010 order denying class action certification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). PETITION DENIED. [7684618] (WL) [Entered: 03/17/2011 09:46 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Respondents Roadway Express, Inc., YRC Inc. and YRC Worldwide Inc. answer to 23f petition. Date of service: 01/19/2011. [7617358] (Mersol, Gregory) [Entered: 01/19/2011 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED ON 01/04/2011 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 23(f). SERVED ON 01/04/2011. [7601008] (HC) [Entered: 01/05/2011 01:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
