In re: Jay Michael Tenenbaum, Esq.
Respondent: In re: JAY MICHAEL TENENBAUM, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 31, 1989
Case Number: 11-80245
Filed: September 15, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2011 Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: DL) On 09/19/2011, the court ordered Mr. Jay Michael Tenenbaum, Esquire to voluntarily resign or to show cause, in writing, why he should not be reciprocally suspended from the practice of law in this court. Compliance with that order was to have been achieved by 10/18/2011. To date, respondent has neither submitted his resignation nor shown cause why he should not be reciprocally suspended from the practice of law before this court. Accordingly, respondent is hereby removed from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 46(c); 9th Cir. R. 46-2; In re Rosenthal , 854 F.2d 1187 (9th Cir. 1988). [7961290] (DL) [Entered: 11/10/2011 08:20 AM]
October 14, 2011 Filing 3 Mail returned on 10/13/2011 addressed to Mr. Jay Michael Tenenbaum, Esquire, re: 09-19-11 Order. Resending to: casefiles- no forwarding address. [7928691] (JFF) [Entered: 10/14/2011 01:43 PM]
September 19, 2011 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DL): The court is informed that respondent Jay Michael Tenenbaum, Esq., has been suspended from the practice of law in California. Within 28 days after the date of this order, respondent Tenenbaum shall resign from the bar of this court or shall show cause in writing why respondent should not be reciprocally suspended from the bar of this court. In re Rosenthal , 854 F.2d 1187 (9th Cir. 1988). Upon consideration of the response to this order and after a hearing, if requested, the court will determine whether to order respondent reciprocally suspended. See Fed. R. App. P. 46(c); 9th Cir. R. 46-2. If an attorney is registered for the Court's Electronic Case Filing system (Appellate ECF) and is suspended or disbarred by this Court, the attorney's Appellate ECF account will also be suspended (locked) until the attorney has been reinstated to the bar of this Court. Failure to respond to this order in a timely fashion will result in removal of respondent from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before this court without further notice. This order shall be provided to respondent via certified mail (tracking number: 70101670000074024014). [7898111] (DL) [Entered: 09/19/2011 01:21 PM]
September 15, 2011 Filing 1 Attorney discipline case docketed. Respondent has been suspended from the practice of law in California. [7895286] (DL) [Entered: 09/15/2011 12:42 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Jay Michael Tenenbaum, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: In re: JAY MICHAEL TENENBAUM, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 31, 1989
Represented By: Jay Michael Tenenbaum Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?