In re: Michael Stoller
| In re: MICHAEL STOLLER, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: December 1, 1985 |
| 11-80262 |
| October 3, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order filed (Appellate Commissioner) On October 25, 2011, this court issued a order to show cause why respondent should not be reciprocally suspended from the bar of this court based on his suspension from the practice of law in California. Respondent timely responded and showed that, effective November 11, 2011, the State Bar of California reinstated him to active status. Accordingly, the October 25, 2011, order to show cause is discharged. No further action will be taken by the court in this matter. The Clerk shall close this docket. [7987787] (DL) [Entered: 12/05/2011 10:58 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Respondent Michael Stoller, Esquire reply to response to Court order dated 10/25/2011. Date of service: 11/21/2011. [7974057] (Stoller, Michael) [Entered: 11/21/2011 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DL): The court is informed that respondent Michael T. Stoller, Esq., has been suspended from the practice of law in California. Within 28 days after the date of this order, respondent Stoller shall resign from the bar of this court or shall show cause in writing why respondent should not be reciprocally suspended for the same amount of time from the bar of this court and ordered to withdraw from all cases presently before this court in which respondent is counsel of record. In re Rosenthal , 854 F.2d 1187 (9th Cir. 1988). Court records reflect that respondent is counsel of record in No. 11-16345 (Motion to withdraw pending). Upon consideration of the response to this order and after a hearing, if requested, the court will determine whether to order respondent reciprocally suspended. See Fed. R. App. P. 46(c); 9th Cir. R. 46-2. If an attorney is registered for the Court's Electronic Case Filing system (Appellate ECF) and is suspended or disbarred by this Court, the attorney's Appellate ECF account will also be suspended (locked) until the attorney has been reinstated to the bar of this Court. Failure to respond to this order in a timely fashion will result in removal of respondent from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before this court without further notice. This order shall be served electronically on respondent. [7941228] (DL) [Entered: 10/25/2011 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 Attorney discipline case docketed. Respondent has been suspended from the practice of law in California. [7913626] (DL) [Entered: 10/03/2011 12:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Michael Stoller | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: In re: MICHAEL STOLLER, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: December 1, 1985 | |
| Represented By: | Michael Stoller Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
