John Visciotti v. Michael Martel

John Visciotti v. Michael Martel

Petitioner - Appellant,:	JOHN LOUIS VISCIOTTI
Respondent - Appellee,:	MICHAEL MARTEL
Case Number:	11-99008
Filed:	August 9, 2011
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
October 17, 2016	Visciotti v. Martel
July 6, 2017	JOHN VISCIOTTI V. MICHAEL MARTEL

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 6, 2017	Filing 9029174275 Filed order and amended opinion (HARRY PREGERSON, A. WALLACE TASHIMA and MARSHA S. BERZON). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED; The opinion filed October 17, 2016 is amended as follows (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) With the aforementioned change, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellant s petition for rehearing. Judge Berzon has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Pregerson and Tashima recommend denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing is denied and the petition for rehearing en banc is rejected. No new petition for panel rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [10498511]

Date Filed

Document Text

July 6, 2017

Filing 9029174275 Filed order and amended opinion (HARRY PREGERSON, A. WALLACE TASHIMA and MARSHA S. BERZON). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED; The opinion filed October 17, 2016 is amended as follows (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) With the aforementioned change, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellant s petition for rehearing. Judge Berzon has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Pregerson and Tashima recommend denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing is denied and the petition for rehearing en banc is rejected. No new petition for panel rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [10498511]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Visciotti v. Michael Martel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant,: JOHN LOUIS VISCIOTTI
Represented By:	Sean Kevin Kennedy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent - appellee,: MICHAEL MARTEL
Represented By:	Meagan J. Beale
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?