John Loos v. Immersion Corporation, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant,: JOHN P. LOOS
Defendant - Appellee,: IMMERSION CORPORATION, VICTOR A. VIEGAS, RALPH EDWARD CLENTON RICHARDSON, STEPHEN M. AMBLER, DANIEL J. CHAVEZ and RICHARD VOGEL
Case Number: 12-15100
Filed: January 17, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 7, 2014 Loos v. Immersion Corp., et al.
September 11, 2014 JOHN LOOS V. IMMERSION CORPORATION

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2014 Filing 9026360435 Filed order and amended opinion (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and THOMAS O. RICE). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED. The Opinion filed on August 7, 2014, is hereby amended as follows: At the end of the final sentence of the first full paragraph on page 18 (now page 19), the following footnote 3 is appended: (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this Order. No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. [9236274]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Loos v. Immersion Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: JOHN P. LOOS
Represented By: Willow E. Radcliffe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: IMMERSION CORPORATION
Represented By: Marie Caroline Bafus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: VICTOR A. VIEGAS
Represented By: Marie Caroline Bafus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: RALPH EDWARD CLENTON RICHARDSON
Represented By: Marie Caroline Bafus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: STEPHEN M. AMBLER
Represented By: Marie Caroline Bafus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: DANIEL J. CHAVEZ
Represented By: Marie Caroline Bafus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: RICHARD VOGEL
Represented By: Marie Caroline Bafus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?