Phillip Roberts v. City of Phoenix, et al
| PHILLIP G. ROBERTS |
| CITY OF PHOENIX and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: John and Jane Does I-X, ABC Corporations I-X, DEF Business Entities I-X, and XYZ Partnerships I-X |
| 12-17281 |
| October 12, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Phillip Roberts v. City of Phoenix, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: PHILLIP G. ROBERTS | |
| Represented By: | Phillip G. Roberts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: CITY OF PHOENIX | |
| Represented By: | Shanks Leonhardt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: John and Jane Does I-X, ABC Corporations I-X, DEF Business Entities I-X, and XYZ Partnerships I-X | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
