Robert Heynen v. Anthem Insurance Companies, In, et al
| ROBERT HEYNEN |
| ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. and ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL & MEDICAL SERVICE, INC., agent of Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield |
| 12-17590 |
| November 21, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert Heynen v. Anthem Insurance Companies, In, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: ROBERT HEYNEN | |
| Represented By: | Matthew L. Sharp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Anna M. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL & MEDICAL SERVICE, INC., agent of Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield | |
| Represented By: | Anna M. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
