Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc, et al
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation |
| MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION and MOTOROLA, INC. |
| 12-35352 |
| May 4, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., et al
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 52 MANDATE ISSUED.(JCW, SRT and MSB) [8403157] (TB) |
| Filing 51 Filed order (J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and MARSHA S. BERZON) The panel has unanimously voted to deny appellants’ petition for rehearing. Judge Thomas and Judge Berzon have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wallace so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing is denied and the petition for rehearing en banc is rejected. [8390942] (WL) |
| Filing 50 Filed (ECF) Appellants General Instrument Corporation and Motorola Mobility, Inc. petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc (from 09/28/2012 opinion). Date of service: 10/12/2012. [8359438] (KMS) |
| Filing 49 Filed (ECF) Appellee Microsoft Corporation Correspondence: Letter correcting errors in listing of counsel in opinion. Date of service: 10/01/2012 [8343172] (CLT) |
Filing 48
FILED OPINION (J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and MARSHA S. BERZON) AFFIRMED. Judge: MSB Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [8341596] (RP)
|
| Filing 47 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and MARSHA S. BERZON. [8319503] (MT) |
| Filing 46 Filed (ECF) Appellants General Instrument Corporation and Motorola Mobility, Inc. citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 09/06/2012. [8313213] (KMS) |
| Filing 43 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Mr. Carter Glasgow Phillips for Appellee Microsoft Corporation. [8294578] (CGP) |
| Filing 42 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Ms. Kathleen M. Sullivan for Appellants General Instrument Corporation and Motorola Mobility, Inc.. [8294356] (KMS) |
| Filing 41 Revised Notice of Oral Argument on Tuesday, September 11, 2012 - 9:30 AM - Courtroom 1, 3rd Floor - James R. Browning US Courthouse - San Francisco, California. Please return ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form to: SAN FRANCISCO Office. Please open attached documents to view details about your case. [8294007] (RB) |
| Filing 40 Filed (ECF) Appellants General Instrument Corporation and Motorola Mobility, Inc. citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 08/16/2012. [8288978] (KMS) |
| Filing 39 Filed (ECF) Appellee Microsoft Corporation citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 08/13/2012. [8284181] (CGP) |
| Filing 38 Filed (ECF) Appellee Microsoft Corporation citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 08/06/2012. [8276096] (CGP) |
| Filing 37 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Ms. Kathleen M. Sullivan for Appellants General Instrument Corporation and Motorola Mobility, Inc.. [8274011] (KMS) |
| Filing 36 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Mr. Carter Glasgow Phillips for Appellee Microsoft Corporation. [8273825] (CGP) |
| Filing 35 Notice of Oral Argument on SEPTEMBER 11 2012 San Francisco Calendar. Please return ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form to: SAN FRANCISCO Office. Please open attached documents to view details about your case. [8270644] (AW) |
| Filing 34 see next entry for corrected attachment [8270627]--[Edited 07/31/2012 by AW] (AW) |
| Filing 33 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KS): Appellants’ motion for further expedition of this preliminary injunction appeal is granted. The Clerk shall calendar this case during the week of September 10, 2012, in San Francisco, California. [8270596] (WL) |
| Filing 32 Filed (ECF) Appellants General Instrument Corporation and Motorola Mobility, Inc. Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 07/25/2012. [8263856] (KMS) |
| Filing 31 Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [29] filed by appellants. [8257393] (SD) |
| Filing 30 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [29] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8252687] (LA) |
| Filing 29 Submitted (ECF) Reply brief for review. Submitted by Appellants General Instrument Corporation and Motorola Mobility, Inc.. Date of service: 07/16/2012. [8252239] (KMS) |
| Filing 28 Received 7 paper copies of Amicus brief [24] filed by Intel Corporation. [8240129] (SD) |
| Filing 27 Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [20] filed by Microsoft Corporation. [8234836] (SD) |
| Filing 26 Filed clerk order: The amicus brief [24] submitted by Intel Corporation is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: green. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8234823] (LA) |
| Filing 25 Entered appearance of Amicus Curiae Intel Corporation. [8234820] (LA) |
| Filing 24 Submitted (ECF) Amicus brief for review (by government or with consent per FRAP 29(a)). Submitted by Intel Corporation. Date of service: 06/29/2012. [8233920] (TGH) |
| Filing 23 Filed Appellee Microsoft Corporation supplemental excerpts of record on appeal in 2 volumes (Vol. 2 FILED UNDER SEAL). [8232168] (LA) |
| Filing 22 Received Appellee Microsoft Corporation's notification of filing Vol. II of supplemental excerpts of record under seal, with DC protective order attached. [8232167] (LA) |
| Filing 21 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [20] submitted by Microsoft Corporation is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8230908] (LA) |
| Filing 20 Submitted (ECF) Answering brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Date of service: 06/27/2012. [8230549] (CGP) |
| Filing 19 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Constantine L. Trela, Jr. for Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Date of service: 06/26/2012. [8227755] (CLT) |
| Filing 18 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Carter Glasgow Phillips for Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Date of service: 06/26/2012. [8227713] (CGP) |
| Filing 17 Received 7 paper copies of Opening brief [14] filed by Appellants. [8202089] (SD) |
| Filing 16 Filed Appellants' excerpts of record in 3 volumes. Served on 05/30/2012. [8197987] (LA) |
| Filing 15 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [14] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8197586] (LA) |
| Filing 14 Submitted (ECF) Opening brief for review. Submitted by Appellants General Instrument Corporation and Motorola Mobility, Inc.. Date of service: 05/30/2012. [8196353] (KMS) |
| Filing 13 Added attorney Derek Shaffer for General Instrument Corporation Motorola Mobility, Inc., in case 12-35352. [8195296] (JFF) |
| Filing 12 Added attorney Kathleen M. Sullivan for General Instrument Corporation. [8195288] (JFF) |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Derek L. Shaffer for Appellants General Instrument Corporation and Motorola Mobility, Inc.. Date of service: 05/30/2012. [8195214] (DS) |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kathleen M. Sullivan for Appellant General Instrument Corporation. Date of service: 05/30/2012. [8195196] (KMS) |
| Filing 9 Filed order MEDIATION (LW): This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Circuit Mediation Program. Counsel may contact Chris Goelz, Circuit Mediator, at (206) 224-2323 or Chris_Goelz@ca9.uscourts.gov to discuss services available through the court’s mediation program, to request a settlement assessment conference, or to request a stay of the appeal for settlement purposes. Also, upon agreement of the parties, the briefing schedule can be modified or vacated to facilitate settlement discussions. [see order] [8185987] (KM) |
| Filing 8 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [8181586] (KM) |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Motorola Mobility, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/11/2012. [8175490] (KMS) |
| Filing 6 Deleted Incorrect Entry (Entered in wrong case). [8175391] (JFF) |
| Filing 5 Added attorney Kathleen M. Sullivan for Motorola Mobility, Inc., in case 12-35352. [8175351] (JFF) |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kathleen M. Sullivan for Appellant Motorola Mobility, Inc.. Date of service: 05/11/2012. [8175299] (KMS) |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KS): The appeal filed May 2, 2012 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than May 30, 2012; the answering brief is due June 27, 2012 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [8165788] (WL) |
| Filing 2 Attorney Stephen P. Pepe in 12-35352 substituted by Steven Pepe in 12-35352 (Court correction of docket) [8165644] (ASW) |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/11/2012. Referred to MOATT pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 3-3.”. [8165559] (KM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
