Hatem Shalabi, et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company, et al
| HATEM M SHALABI and PYRAMID GOLD, INC. |
| ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., individually and as successor-in interest to Atlantic Richfield Company, BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to Atlantic Richfield Company and BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
| 12-36029 |
| December 14, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| HATEM SHALABI V. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Hatem Shalabi, et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: HATEM M SHALABI | |
| Represented By: | Adam T. Birnbaum |
| Represented By: | David A. Schiller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: PYRAMID GOLD, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Adam T. Birnbaum |
| Represented By: | David A. Schiller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Clayton Berry |
| Represented By: | Zachary Robert Hiatt |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Oates |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., individually and as successor-in interest to Atlantic Richfield Company | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Clayton Berry |
| Represented By: | Zachary Robert Hiatt |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Oates |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to Atlantic Richfield Company | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Clayton Berry |
| Represented By: | Zachary Robert Hiatt |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Oates |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Clayton Berry |
| Represented By: | Zachary Robert Hiatt |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Oates |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
