William Radcliffe, III v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant,: WILLIAM RADCLIFFE, III
Defendant - Appellee,: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA and PROFESSIONAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
Case Number: 12-55088
Filed: January 13, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 11, 2014 WILLIAM RADCLIFFE, III V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: William Radcliffe, III v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: WILLIAM RADCLIFFE, III
Represented By: Andrew R. Stilwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA
Represented By: Jonathan Matthew Hurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: PROFESSIONAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Brandon L. Reeves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?