Sabrina Laguna, et al v. Coverall North America, Inc., et al
| SABRINA LAGUNA, an individual, CARLOS ACEVEDO, an individual, TERESA SALAS, an individual and ROES 3-50, on behalf of themselves and in a representative capacity for all others similarly situated |
| AMRIT SINGH |
| COVERALL NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation, ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation, CNA HOLDING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, TED ELLIOTT, an individual and DOES, 5-50, inclusive |
| 12-55479 |
| March 14, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Laguna v. Coverall North America
|
|
SABRINA LAGUNA V. COVERALL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
|
|
SABRINA LAGUNA V. COVERALL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9026273974
Filed Order for PUBLICATION (RONALD M. GOULD, JAY S. BYBEE and EDWARD M. CHEN) One or more members of this court has interest in calling for sua sponte en banc review of the three-judge panel opinion in this case, filed on June 3, 2014. Plaintiffs-Appellees and Defendants-Appellees are each ordered to file a response to the Petition for Rehearing En Banc that was filed and subsequently withdrawn by Objector-Appellant Singh. The responses should set forth their positions on whether the case should be reheard en banc, and include whether the settlement agreement makes this case moot and whether the prior panel opinion should be vacated. The responses of the parties shall be filed within 21 days of the filing of this order. Fifty copies should be filed. After both such responses are received by the court, any member of this court will have 7 days in which to make a sua sponte en banc call. Any person or entity wishing to file a brief as an amicus curiae in response to this order is granted leave to do so pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 29(a). Plaintiffs-Appellees, Defendants-Appellees, and Objector-Appellant are further ordered to file with this court a copy of the settlement agreement referenced in Objector-Appellant s Notice of Withdrawal of Petition for Rehearing En Banc, Waiver of Right to Seek Further Review, and Stipulation Regarding Finality of Court s Ruling. To the extent, if any, that the written settlement agreement does not reflect the full understanding of the settling parties, the parties shall separately set forth any additional terms or understandings that are not reflected in the written agreement. The settlement agreement and any additional statement may be filed under seal if confidential. The settlement agreement and any additional statement shall be filed at or before the time that Plaintiffs-Appellees and Defendants-Appellees file their responses. The Joint Request for Expedited Issuance of Mandate is DENIED. [9199190]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
