Michael Cuero v. Matthew Cate

Michael Cuero v. Matthew Cate

Petitioner - Appellant,:	MICHAEL DANIEL CUERO
Respondent - Appellee,:	MATTHEW CATE
Case Number:	12-55911
Filed:	May 16, 2012
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
June 30, 2016	Cuero v. Cate
March 8, 2017	MICHAEL CUERO V. MATTHEW CATE
September 19, 2018	MICHAEL CUERO V. SCOTT KERNAN
January 28, 2019	MICHAEL CUERO V. SCOTT KERNAN

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 8, 2017	Filing 9028840956 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, BARRY G. SILVERMAN and KIM MCLANE WARDLAW) (Concurrence by Judge Wardlaw; Dissent by Judge Callahan) Judges Silverman and Wardlaw have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. Judge O Scannlain has voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. [10347633]

Date Filed

Document Text

March 8, 2017

Filing 9028840956 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, BARRY G. SILVERMAN and KIM MCLANE WARDLAW) (Concurrence by Judge Wardlaw; Dissent by Judge Callahan) Judges Silverman and Wardlaw have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. Judge O Scannlain has voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. [10347633]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Cuero v. Matthew Cate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant,: MICHAEL DANIEL CUERO
Represented By:	Michael Daniel Cuero
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent - appellee,: MATTHEW CATE
Represented By:	Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?