Sigitas Raulinaitis, et al v. LASD
| LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT |
| SIGITAS RAULINAITIS and RIMA RAULINAITIS |
| 12-56508 |
| August 15, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 38 MANDATE ISSUED. (EL, BGS and SPG) [10214777] (CW) [Entered: 11/30/2016 07:29 AM] |
| Filing 37 FILED MEMORANDUM (EDWARD LEAVY, BARRY G. SILVERMAN and SUSAN P. GRABER) AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [10188305] (GB) [Entered: 11/07/2016 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 36 Received 7 paper copies of Supplemental Brief [ # 34 ] filed by LASD. [10129801] (SD) [Entered: 09/20/2016 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 35 Filed clerk order: The supplemental brief [ # 34 ] submitted by LASD is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: tan. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. [10125978] (ANL) [Entered: 09/16/2016 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 34 Submitted (ECF) Supplemental Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee LASD. Date of service: 09/13/2016. [10122569] [12-56508]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief. 09/16/2016 by SLM] (Choi, Lana) [Entered: 09/13/2016 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 33 Received 7 paper copies of Supplemental Brief [ # 27 ] filed by Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis. [10120180] (SD) [Entered: 09/12/2016 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 32 Filed clerk order: The supplemental brief [ # 27 ] submitted by Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: tan. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. [10111199] (GV) [Entered: 09/02/2016 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 31 Added attorney Alexandra Zuiderweg for LASD, in case 12-56508. [10110943] (CW) [Entered: 09/02/2016 07:28 AM] |
| Filing 30 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Alexandra Zuiderweg for Appellee LASD. Date of service: 09/01/2016. [10110423] [12-56508] (Zuiderweg, Alexandra) [Entered: 09/01/2016 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 29 Added attorney Lana Choi for LASD, in case 12-56508. [10110301] (CW) [Entered: 09/01/2016 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 28 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Lana Choi for Appellee LASD. Date of service: 09/01/2016. [10110274] [12-56508] (Choi, Lana) [Entered: 09/01/2016 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 27 Submitted (ECF) Supplemental Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis. Date of service: 08/31/2016. [10107568] [12-56508]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief and certificate of service. 09/02/2016 by SLM] (Birdt, Jonathan) [Entered: 08/31/2016 06:19 AM] |
| Filing 26 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: HL): The parties are ordered to provide supplemental briefs in light of the en banc decision in Peruta v. County of San Diego, No. 10-56971 and Richards v. Prieto, No. 11-16255. Briefs shall be no longer than twenty (20) pages and shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days of this order. [10097937] (AF) [Entered: 08/23/2016 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 25 Added attorney Edward Hsu for LASD, in case 12-56508. [9532646] (KB) [Entered: 05/11/2015 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 24 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Edward L. Hsu for Appellee LASD. Date of service: 05/11/2015. [9532390] [12-56508] (Hsu, Edward) [Entered: 05/11/2015 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 23 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: HL): Appellants request, filed on November 12, 2014, to summarily remand this action is denied. This case is stayed pending this courts mandate in Peruta v. County of San Diego, 10-56971, or further order of the court. [9317310] (AF) [Entered: 11/18/2014 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 22 Filed (ECF) Appellants Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis Correspondence: Request to Remand action.. Date of service: 11/12/2014 [9308748] [12-56508] (JB) [Entered: 11/12/2014 08:25 AM] |
| Filing 21 Filed Appellee LASD paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 15 ] in 1 volume(s). [8559137] (WP) |
| Filing 20 Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [ # 15 ] filed by LASD. [8558018] (DB) |
| Filing 19 Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [ # 16 ] filed by Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis. [8552563] (SD) |
| Filing 18 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 16 ] submitted by Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8549391] (WP) |
| Filing 17 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 15 ] submitted by LASD is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the supplemental excerpts of record [ # 16 ] submitted by LASD. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [8549381] (WP) |
| Filing 16 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis. Date of service: 03/13/2013. [8548687] (JB) |
| Filing 15 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief and supplemental excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellee LASD. Date of service: 03/13/2013. [8548618] (JAL) |
| Filing 14 Streamlined request [13] by Appellee LASD to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellee LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT answering brief due 03/15/2013. The optional reply brief is due 14 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [8519805] (LN) |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee LASD. New requested due date is 03/15/2013. [8519557] (JAL) |
| Filing 12 Filed order MEDIATION (VLS): Based on a review of the Mediation Questionnaire, this case is not selected for inclusion in the Mediation Program. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. Counsel for any party interested in obtaining assistance from the court in pursuing settlement of the case on appeal or learning more about the Mediation Program is encouraged to contact Roxane G. Ashe, Circuit Mediator, by fax (415) 355-8566. The communication will be kept confidential, if requested, from the other parties in the case. Counsel are requested to send copies of this order to their clients. [8338816] (AF) |
| Filing 11 Filed Appellants Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis excerpts of record in 1 volume. Served on 08/16/2012. [8303236] (WP) |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellants Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis Correspondence: Request to consolidate and expedite.. Date of service: 08/25/2012 [8299529] (JB) |
| Filing 9 Received 7 paper copies of Opening brief [ # 5 ] filed by Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis. [8297227] (SD) |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 5 ] submitted by Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8293048] (LA) |
| Filing 7 Added attorney Jennifer Ann Delgado Lehman for LASD, in case 12-56508. [8290810] (EL) |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jennifer A.D. Lehman for Appellee LASD. Date of service: 08/17/2012. [8290804] (JAL) |
| Filing 5 Submitted (ECF) Opening brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis. Date of service: 08/16/2012. [8290146]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached certificate of service. Resent NDA. 08/20/2012 by RY] (JB) |
| Filing 4 Added attorney Jonathan Birdt for Sigitas Raulinaitis Rima Raulinaitis, in case 12-56508. [8288061] (EL) |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/15/2012. [8288017] (JB) |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Joanthan Wesley Birdt for Appellants Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis. Date of service: 08/15/2012. [8288011] (JB) |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/22/2012. Transcript ordered by 09/14/2012. Transcript due 12/13/2012. Appellants Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis opening brief due 01/22/2013. Appellee LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT answering brief due 02/21/2013. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8287713] (FB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
